![]() ![]() When you use PowerDot consistently - across approximately 10 workouts and beyond - you’re going to see the long-term effects that it has on your body’s endurance capabilities. This effect is called post-activation potentiation, and it’s going to work wonders for your muscular endurance workouts. In other words, even after you’ve put your device away and gotten started on your workout, you’re still reaping the benefits of electric muscle stimulation. The electrical stimulation triggers muscle contractions that will positively benefit the mechanical performance of subsequent muscle contractions. PowerDot’s potentiation program is built specifically to warm you up so that you have a safe, effective, successful workout. Your body isn’t ready to train in the way that it needs to be. If you prep your body for a workout with a few high-knees and bending over to touch your toes, we can all but guarantee that your muscular endurance is going to suffer. PowerDot and Muscular Endurance: The Benefits Let’s talk about how you can use it to boost your muscle health and functionality, and how it can improve your endurance training more specifically. But there’s yet another ally you can have in your toolkit to improve your muscular endurance: PowerDot. There was no difference in lower body muscular endurance on the back squat between the athletes.If you’re looking to improve your health and fitness, you want to stack the odds in your favor as much as possible. In the present analysis, female track and field athletes demonstrated greater upper body muscular endurance on the bench press than male counterparts. The latter activates more muscle and requires more training for proper execution. Speculatively, the opposing statistical findings between the bench press and the back squat may have been a result of the athletes training age or the technical skill level necessary to perform the back squat. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study align with work demonstrating sex differences between females and males, wherein females exhibited greater relative resistance to fatigue. 410) in repetitions completed between female and male athletes when evaluating the back squat (32.0 ± 11.0 versus 27.3 ± 7.5). There was no statistical difference ( p =. 020) than the male athletes in the bench press when comparing repetitions completed (25.9 ± 4.5 versus 19.8 ± 3.3). The female athletes demonstrated greater muscular endurance ( p =. RESULTS: The female (n = 6) and male (n = 7) participants were relatively young (20.7 ± 1.4 and 19 ± 1.1 yrs., respectively) and lean (23.2 ± 4.8 and 15.2 ± 2.1 %BF, respectively). Statistical significance was accepted at p <. ![]() An independent t-test was used to evaluate the results for each lift. In session 3, each athlete lifted 60% of their 1RM on the bench press and back squat for as many full repetitions as possible until momentary concentric failure. In session 2, whole body composition was assessed by DEXA. In session 1, maximal strength for the bench press and back squat was recorded. METHODS: A total of 13 Division II track and field athletes completed the 3 sessions. ![]() PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare muscular endurance between female and male track and field athletes during the barbell bench press and barbell back squat. The relationship between muscle mass and muscular strength is established, but the relationship between muscle mass and muscular endurance is not as clear. Females are typically considered to have less muscle mass than males. Muscular endurance relates to the ability of a muscle to contract repeatedly at a submaximal intensity. 1University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, Missouri ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |